Powerful reminder that AI isn’t a shortcu, it’s a spotlight. Without solid analytics, all it illuminates is noise. The trick is in asking better questions before seeking smarter answers. Analytics isn’t just prep work; it’s the strategic lens that ensures AI delivers impact, not illusion. The WWII survivorship bias case is a timeless masterclass, first heard it in stats class 15 years ago, and it still cuts through noise better than most modern examples. Looking forward to Part 2.
Hello sir… thank you for your interest in my Substack articles… so I visited your post about A.I. being an effective tool for decision making. Fascinating to me as I do not believe logic flow charts are beneficial for our species. I believe we are emotional beings capable of correctly identifying the gait of any individual.
Now I can see the benefits of A.I. in an explorative manner, making better products for civilization or even perhaps to aid entrepreneurs in designing sentient products.
It is your application of A.I. that disturbs me. I have never met a number that could evaluate or even understand what is important in life. As a member of human race I find it insulting to believe that statistics and measurements of profitability is to be trusted more than “Gut” instincts.
A.I. can never, ever be considered a cultural vocation from which to earn money to prospers tribal or even familial goals. It is A.I. vocation is strictly a societal vocation and everyone knows society doesn’t give a shit about anyone as they are in the business of exploiting civilization.
However more disturbing is the fact that this vocation is built on numerical fantasies of being able to diagnose problems and solve them… Why are numbers fantasy? Because I never met a mathematician who could point to nothing… the value they place on the shoulders of 0.
There is a difference between human math and sentient math. Sentient math is able to do what quantum computing can never do… Sentient equations recognize 0 as being everything, not nothing. As a result we are able to account for all variables of relationship between the subject matter that is being explored.
Sentient math is used for exploring possibilities in contrast human math looks to exploit life. But no one needs a calculator in order to survive… instead sentient beings rely on their ability to read gait of all living things. I believe that psychologist call it being a Sigma processing individual.
A.I. will never be able to create passion… but it can produce amazing measurements of probabilities. However I am not subject to probabilities as I am a sentient being. We are not at mercy of some bastard algorithm dictating which course of action to take to survive. No we claim possibilities as our species ruler of voice… Sorry for such a long discourse, however I am after all, passionate.
Question can you give me an example of how A.I. is more qualified to create ideas than a sentient being can use? For humans, I can understand how it would tremendously keep them enslaved as a non thinking aberration of life.
First, thank you for taking time to share your opinion on this. I truly appreciate it💯. I am also an advocate for the need to let humans be humans, and I STRONGLY believe that though AI can automate certain tasks, It will not replace the the need for human uniqueness or input in technical or creative processes (it will at best transform some of them).
That being said, let me try to address some valid concerns you raised:
1. AI over Human intuition: I am not preaching AI over human intuition,… rather I am trying to encourage the augmentation of human intuition with Data driven approach.
As a matter of fact matter of fact, most good data analytical processes start from good intuition (hypothesis, etc). So I am not pitching AI against human intuition, I only encourage we validate our intuition with data where possible.
2. I agree with you that data can sometimes reveal patterns from the past that doesn’t always apply to the future (which is an area intuition could excel)… Now the idea is not to follow data / patterns blindly. But to facilitate informed decision making… so even when we choose to ignore the data and follow intuition (at least we know why we are doing that).
3. I completely agree with you. AI can’t create passion or fill the roles a human takes. If you have seen my article on “Right vs Wrong ways to use AI” (https://open.substack.com/pub/nnitiwe/p/smart-ai-smarter-business-using-generative) you will see I am in complete agreement💯💯 with you. I do not encourage the use of AI unsupervised or even a a lazy tool that obscures the need for human drive and creativity. AI is not truly creative, it’s just very good with pattern mapping & generation.
I hope my response has provided some context?
PS: This article is specifically focused on applications to the business-context.
Powerful reminder that AI isn’t a shortcu, it’s a spotlight. Without solid analytics, all it illuminates is noise. The trick is in asking better questions before seeking smarter answers. Analytics isn’t just prep work; it’s the strategic lens that ensures AI delivers impact, not illusion. The WWII survivorship bias case is a timeless masterclass, first heard it in stats class 15 years ago, and it still cuts through noise better than most modern examples. Looking forward to Part 2.
I completely agree with you💯💯. AI is not a Shortcut.
Also, the “WWII” example. It also stuck with me since the day I first heard it too.
Part 2 is in the works 😁😅.
Hello sir… thank you for your interest in my Substack articles… so I visited your post about A.I. being an effective tool for decision making. Fascinating to me as I do not believe logic flow charts are beneficial for our species. I believe we are emotional beings capable of correctly identifying the gait of any individual.
Now I can see the benefits of A.I. in an explorative manner, making better products for civilization or even perhaps to aid entrepreneurs in designing sentient products.
It is your application of A.I. that disturbs me. I have never met a number that could evaluate or even understand what is important in life. As a member of human race I find it insulting to believe that statistics and measurements of profitability is to be trusted more than “Gut” instincts.
A.I. can never, ever be considered a cultural vocation from which to earn money to prospers tribal or even familial goals. It is A.I. vocation is strictly a societal vocation and everyone knows society doesn’t give a shit about anyone as they are in the business of exploiting civilization.
However more disturbing is the fact that this vocation is built on numerical fantasies of being able to diagnose problems and solve them… Why are numbers fantasy? Because I never met a mathematician who could point to nothing… the value they place on the shoulders of 0.
There is a difference between human math and sentient math. Sentient math is able to do what quantum computing can never do… Sentient equations recognize 0 as being everything, not nothing. As a result we are able to account for all variables of relationship between the subject matter that is being explored.
Sentient math is used for exploring possibilities in contrast human math looks to exploit life. But no one needs a calculator in order to survive… instead sentient beings rely on their ability to read gait of all living things. I believe that psychologist call it being a Sigma processing individual.
A.I. will never be able to create passion… but it can produce amazing measurements of probabilities. However I am not subject to probabilities as I am a sentient being. We are not at mercy of some bastard algorithm dictating which course of action to take to survive. No we claim possibilities as our species ruler of voice… Sorry for such a long discourse, however I am after all, passionate.
Question can you give me an example of how A.I. is more qualified to create ideas than a sentient being can use? For humans, I can understand how it would tremendously keep them enslaved as a non thinking aberration of life.
First, thank you for taking time to share your opinion on this. I truly appreciate it💯. I am also an advocate for the need to let humans be humans, and I STRONGLY believe that though AI can automate certain tasks, It will not replace the the need for human uniqueness or input in technical or creative processes (it will at best transform some of them).
That being said, let me try to address some valid concerns you raised:
1. AI over Human intuition: I am not preaching AI over human intuition,… rather I am trying to encourage the augmentation of human intuition with Data driven approach.
As a matter of fact matter of fact, most good data analytical processes start from good intuition (hypothesis, etc). So I am not pitching AI against human intuition, I only encourage we validate our intuition with data where possible.
2. I agree with you that data can sometimes reveal patterns from the past that doesn’t always apply to the future (which is an area intuition could excel)… Now the idea is not to follow data / patterns blindly. But to facilitate informed decision making… so even when we choose to ignore the data and follow intuition (at least we know why we are doing that).
3. I completely agree with you. AI can’t create passion or fill the roles a human takes. If you have seen my article on “Right vs Wrong ways to use AI” (https://open.substack.com/pub/nnitiwe/p/smart-ai-smarter-business-using-generative) you will see I am in complete agreement💯💯 with you. I do not encourage the use of AI unsupervised or even a a lazy tool that obscures the need for human drive and creativity. AI is not truly creative, it’s just very good with pattern mapping & generation.
I hope my response has provided some context?
PS: This article is specifically focused on applications to the business-context.